Langlois Charles Victor
Charles-Victor Langlois (May 26, 1863, in Rouen - June 25, 1929, in Paris) was a French historian and paleographer, who specialized in the study of the Middle Ages and taught at the Sorbonne. Langlois attended the École Nationale des Chartes and earned a doctorate in history in 1887. He taught at the University of Douai before moving to the Sorbonne. He was director of the National Archives of France from 1913 to 1929. His 1897 work Introduction aux études historiques, written with Charles Seignobos, is considered one of the first comprehensive manuals discussing the use of scientific techniques in historical research.[1]
do you like this author?
What readers are saying
What do you think? Write your own comment on this book!
write a commentWhat readers are saying
What do you think? Write your own comment on this author!
write a commentBook list
add to favoritesadd In favorites
the historic role of france among the nations an address delivered at the unive
Series:
Unknown
Year:
Unknown
Raiting:
2.5/5
Show more
add to favoritesadd In favorites
Introduction to the Study of History
Series:
Unknown
Year:
Unknown
Raiting:
4.5/5
Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: that not all have been able to escape the two dangers to which works of this character are exposedthat of being obscure on the one hand, or commonplace on the other. J. G. Droysen's Grundriss der Historik is heavy, pedantic, and confused beyond all imagination.1 Freeman, Tardif, and Chevalier tell us nothing but what is elementary and obvious. Their followers may still be observed discussing at interminable length idle questions, such as : whether history is a science or an art; what are the duties of history; what is the use of history; and so on. On the other hand, there is incontestable truth in the remark that nearly all the specialists and historians of to-day are, as far as method goes, self-taught, with no training except what they have gained by practice, or by imitating and associating with the older masters of the craft. But though many works on the principles of method justify the distrust with which such works are generally regarded, and though most professed historians have been able, apparently with no ill results, to dispense with reflection upon historical method, it would, in our opinion, be a strained inference to conclude that specialists and historians (especiallythose of the future) have no need to make themselves acquainted with the processes of historical work. The literature of methodology is, in fact, not without its value : gradually there has been formed a treasury of subtle observations and precise rules, suggested by experience, which are something more than mere common sense.1 And, admitting the existence of those who, without having over learnt to reason, always reason well, by a gift of nature, it would be easy to set against these exceptions innumerable cases in which ignorance of logic, the use of irrational methods, want of reflection on the ...
Show more
add to favoritesadd In favorites
Book list
add to favoritesadd In favorites
the historic role of france among the nations an address delivered at the unive
Series:
Unknown
Year:
Unknown
Raiting:
2.5/5
Show more
add to favoritesadd In favorites
Introduction to the Study of History
Series:
Unknown
Year:
Unknown
Raiting:
4.5/5
Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: that not all have been able to escape the two dangers to which works of this character are exposedthat of being obscure on the one hand, or commonplace on the other. J. G. Droysen's Grundriss der Historik is heavy, pedantic, and confused beyond all imagination.1 Freeman, Tardif, and Chevalier tell us nothing but what is elementary and obvious. Their followers may still be observed discussing at interminable length idle questions, such as : whether history is a science or an art; what are the duties of history; what is the use of history; and so on. On the other hand, there is incontestable truth in the remark that nearly all the specialists and historians of to-day are, as far as method goes, self-taught, with no training except what they have gained by practice, or by imitating and associating with the older masters of the craft. But though many works on the principles of method justify the distrust with which such works are generally regarded, and though most professed historians have been able, apparently with no ill results, to dispense with reflection upon historical method, it would, in our opinion, be a strained inference to conclude that specialists and historians (especiallythose of the future) have no need to make themselves acquainted with the processes of historical work. The literature of methodology is, in fact, not without its value : gradually there has been formed a treasury of subtle observations and precise rules, suggested by experience, which are something more than mere common sense.1 And, admitting the existence of those who, without having over learnt to reason, always reason well, by a gift of nature, it would be easy to set against these exceptions innumerable cases in which ignorance of logic, the use of irrational methods, want of reflection on the ...
Show more
add to favoritesadd In favorites
What readers are saying
What do you think? Write your own comment on this author!
write a commentif you like Langlois Charles Victor try:
readers also enjoyed
What readers are saying
What do you think? Write your own comment on this author!
write a commentGenre
if you like Langlois Charles Victor try:
readers also enjoyed
Do you want to read a book that interests you? It’s EASY!
Create an account and send a request for reading to other users on the Webpage of the book!
